Slack Business - Enterprise Reviews

I appreciate the rich integrations that allow us to monitor and interact with a number of our systems and infrastructures.

We are given an overview of our system status. We are able to respond quickly to infrastructure events, marketing events, customer service events, etc.

Threaded discussion needs improving.

I have used the product for two years.

We had no stability issues.

We had no scalability issues.

I haven't needed technical support.

The setup was straightforward as the Slackbot walks you through the whole process.

Be sure to delete inactive users.

Take advantage of integrations.

Creating chats with any combination of people and the remind function.

We've been using it almost from the very start. It has helped us keep communication open between our international offices.

There are a lot of features in Slack that I don't use, because I don't know about them. I found the remind feature when I Googled the Pomodoro technique. I found this by chance. It would be helpful if Slackbot gave me some tips on features that I don't currently use.

We have been using the solution for more than two years.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I have never needed technical support.

I did not use another solution previously.

The setup was straightforward.

It is a great product and the mobile app is a big plus.

I appreciate the ability to create multiple private or open channels.

• The ability to create ad hoc channels for certain projects has made us more effective.
• The mobile app allows us to communicate on the go, which saves time as well.
• Onboarding new users is easy thanks to Slack's great UI.

There seems to be several minutes of delay between getting notifications on the Mac OS app and then receiving them on the iPhone app.

I’ve been using Slack for over a year.

We haven't really had any stability issues.

The product works very well. I haven't personally had the need to contact Slack's support. I did have a question about using Slack several months ago which I posted on Twitter. Their Twitter support team was very responsive and helpful.

We used Skype before Slack. We switched because Slack offered:

• The ability to create multiple channels
• A more user friendly interface
• The ability to keep us more organized and effective

I would recommend considering staying on the free version. It does limit you in terms of the history of communication and storage, but I think that these problems can be worth overcoming. This is the case especially if you are a smaller team or a startup that needs to watch where you spend your dollars.

We decided to just test Slack out first with no intentions to switch from Skype. However, the whole team fell in love with the product. At this current moment, we are experimenting with Workplace though.

Once you sign up, try keeping things clean by creating multiple channels. This will ensure that individual conversations are relevant and that the team does not get distracted by unnecessary chatter.

The ability to create separate channels is valuable.

For projects, it's improved how we share files. The Google Drive extension means that files can be housed right inside of Slack. We can focus on work without distractions.

Microsoft and Google are creating competitive equivalents. Slack needs to find a "secret sauce" that can differentiate them further.

I have used Slack on and off for the past few years. I use it with some side projects.

We have not had any stability issues.

We have not had any scalability issues.

We did not have a previous solution.

The initial installation was not at all complex. It was very WYSIWYG.

I use the free version.

We did not evaluate any alternatives.

It comes right out of the box. Start exploring!

Direct messaging and having conversations in channels. I love the channels feature, because it allows you to sort conversations. The only people who will see those conversations are people who are interested in that channel or are part of that initiative/project.

We have slashed our internal emails by 30% and streamlined the tools we use for instant messaging.

The profile feature needs improvement. There is little room to add details to this section. It would be nice to be able to add more links or have other ways to connect in this section.

The ability to flesh out the Profile section in Slack by including links
to multiple social channels, a beefier bio and a link to a website would
be helpful for communities using Slack. This feature may not be as
necessary for teams using Slack as an internal communication tool, but
it would encourage them to follow each on other social channels and
potentially spark more engagement across channels.

I have been using Slack for just over a year.

We have not had stability problems.

We did have scalability issues. If you are on the free plan, you are only allowed 10,000 messages before everything is archived. This is a big problem for an alumni group which I am a member of that uses Slack.

Our messages are archived every two weeks, which makes it challenging to search for former conversations.

The price of using Slack would be $30,000/year for that community, which I think is quite steep.

I've never used technical support.

I used Skype for instant messaging and LinkedIn/Facebook groups for community engagement. Skype is clunky and has an outdate user interface.

Slack is slick, smooth, and easy on the eyes.

LinkedIn/Facebook groups are cluttered and distracting. It's too easy for an "oh, shiny" moment to happen on those social platforms.

The setup was straightforward. Slack is great about walking you through the process of setting up channels and inviting people to join.

Stay on the free version and use PaperBot in every Slack channel to "archive" conversations. This helps you work around the problem with 10,000 messages.

We looked at Skype for instant messaging and Discourse for community engagement.

If you're looking for an asynchronous/real-time communications tool, you will not find any app that comes close to Slack.

The feature that is most valuable is the ability to be a part of multiple Slack channels that are all specific to our needs i.e. a product, infrastructure, personal one-on-one, small specific group, feature discussion, IT assistance, company announcements, etc.

The quick line of communication, most certainly improves the functionality of our organization. Discussions can happen at the drop of a hat, in a Slack channel and a critical decision can be agreed upon to take further action. Triage of customer issues can happen at the moment of crisis and this is of huge assistance as to how we can get our product back up and running, when needed.

I'd like the ability to re-organize the channels in my list. You can favorite a channel but you can't organize them in a specific order, that fits your every day use. I'd also improve it's security. It can be breached easier than an email client, so we tend to keep more confidential conversations out of the app.

I have personally used this solution for over two years.

Our Slack bots have issues from time to time. There have been a few times where the app was done but other than that, it has been a solid performer.

There were no issues with the scalability.

I have personally not used technical support for Slack.

We were using Gchat as a source to speak to each other but channel functionality is very important in Slack.

I was not part of the initial setup.

I am sure that other options were evaluated but I was not a part of that decision-making process.

Providing API connections to your bug database and any other database that you use, can give you updates and links inside of a channel, which is a huge help.

• Channel conversations, because it's an easy way to get to a few people or a whole team at the same time.
• Private conversations, because they're simple, convenient and they work!
• Slackbot reminders, because it's a simple way to set a reminder for yourself or a colleague, without messing with calendars.
• Integrations. For instance, thanks to integration of our own application Woodpecker.co with Slack through Zapier, we get notified each time one of our users starts the paying process and each time they complete it. We can actually see the new customers coming on board in real time.
• Slack is just a communicator, no more. It has a narrow set of features focused on team communication. It's simple. I guess that's why it works so well for us.

Everyone's up to date with what's going on in our product development, marketing and sales. We communicate faster and no one has any troubles learning how to use the communicator.

I would like to see if someone has already read my message, but that's just a whim, not really a necessary must-have feature.

We have used the solution for over two years.

We hardly ever had any issues with stability. I remember Slack was only down once over the whole time I've been using it so far.

We haven't yet had any issues with scalability, but our team is quite small with only 17 people at the moment.

In fact, I never felt the need to contact support, so I have no experience with that, but I guess that's great!

We used a number of solutions which were really only a feature of a bigger product.

The setup was simple for me, but I was joining the team someone else set up.

We're using the free version and some people from our team wish that the message history had not been removed, so if you sometimes need to go back a few months in a conversation, the paid version would be something to consider.

Definitely give Slack a try.

• Seamless integration between devices
• Effective organization of shared content (documents, images, etc.) keeps team on same page
• Syntax highlighting
• Nice overall UX

Slack kept several remote employees working cohesively and seamlessly together, allowing us to more easily synchronize our efforts and work collaboratively rather than "islands unto ourselves," so to speak. Coding, writing, editing, etc. was all done in an effective manner, as a result.

Honestly, I feel like I am nitpicking when I say the UX can be improved. But it is true, incrementally, the UX could see an improvement through extensive tweaking and testing.

I have used it for three years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues; it was very smooth.

Slack has proved to be the most stable communication tool I have used, to date.

We have not encountered any scalability issues; large teams seem to be handled quite well.

I previously used HipChat. The decision was not mine to switch, but I found the switch to be a very positive one. Slack was just more slick, especially with sharing content and keeping a history of it, visible to conversation participants as needed.