No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

What is Make?

Get the report
Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Featured Make reviews

Make mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Make in the Process Automation category stands at 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make1.2%
Camunda15.7%
Temporal5.7%
Other77.4%
Process Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Make reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProcess AutomationMar 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs CamundaMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs Control-MMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs TemporalMar 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.115.7%89%78 interviewsAdd to research
Pega Platform4.15.4%91%86 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 29, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise43
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
14%
Non Tech Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Media Company
4%
Legal Firm
3%
University
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Government
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Maritime Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare Make with alternative products

Learn more about Make

Make customers

Related questions

 
Make Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions4.0I find Make's drag-and-drop interface intuitive and efficient for creating automations. However, its pricing can be burdensome, and security documentation needs improvement. While Make offers flexibility, n8n is a more cost-effective alternative gaining traction in the market.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways4.5I’ve used Make for three years to automate workflows and debug issues; its clear UI, coding flexibility, and new AI feature save me time and cut costs with strong ROI. I want auto-building, deeper LLM/Ollama integration, and possibly open source.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees4.5I use Make for automating diverse workflows like inventory and social media, significantly reducing time and boosting ROI. Its simplicity, powerful integrations, and user-friendly UI are great, despite minor authentication issues. I'd give it a 9/10, wishing for a dark mode.
Executive at Core Jobs4.5I find Make exceptional (90/100) for automating workflows, saving hours of work. I recommend a more visual UI and an improved credit monetization model to better justify costs and ensure continuous use.
Network Engineer at AT&T4.0I use Make to build reliable, scalable API integrations and automations across many apps, saving hundreds of hours and reducing churn by 30%. It’s more cost-effective than Zapier, but needs more connectors, flexible pricing, and better troubleshooting documentation.
Business Development Consultant at Byjus4.5I use Make daily for automating diverse tasks, including GoHighLevel integration and Airbnb scraping, significantly transforming manual work. It saves me substantial time and money, though I experience occasional platform lag and rapid credit consumption.
Freelancer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees4.0I found Make valuable for medical analysis and PDF conversion, praising its visual debugging, hosting, and error handling. File size limits, complex API modules, and errors halting execution did impact my workflow. I rated it 8/10 for its stability and ROI.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I used Make to automate backend integrations for an IoT dashboard, saving significant time and money by avoiding custom code and speeding up development. However, debugging complex workflows is challenging, needing better logs and error tracing.