No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

What is Make?

Get the report
Helped 899,258 peers since 2012

Featured Make reviews

Make mindshare

Product category:
As of June 2026, the mindshare of Make in the Process Automation category stands at 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make1.6%
Camunda10.9%
IBM BPM5.3%
Other82.2%
Process Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Make reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProcess AutomationJun 14, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 14, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs CamundaJun 14, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs Control-MJun 14, 2026Download
ComparisonMake vs TemporalJun 14, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.110.9%89%78 interviewsAdd to research
Pega Platform4.15.1%91%87 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated May 24, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business89
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise53
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Non Tech Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Transportation Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Legal Firm
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Individual & Family Service
3%
Computer Software Company
2%
University
2%
Retailer
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Government
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Maritime Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%

Compare Make with alternative products

Learn more about Make

Make customers

Related questions

 
Make Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions4.0I find Make's drag-and-drop interface intuitive and efficient for creating automations. However, its pricing can be burdensome, and security documentation needs improvement. While Make offers flexibility, n8n is a more cost-effective alternative gaining traction in the market.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways4.5I’ve used Make for three years to automate workflows and debug issues; its clear UI, coding flexibility, and new AI feature save me time and cut costs with strong ROI. I want auto-building, deeper LLM/Ollama integration, and possibly open source.
Executive at Core Jobs4.5I find Make exceptional (90/100) for automating workflows, saving hours of work. I recommend a more visual UI and an improved credit monetization model to better justify costs and ensure continuous use.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees4.0I rely on Make for complex workflow automation, valuing its visual builder and seamless system integrations, which save significant time. Although pricing is high and customization could improve, it's a powerful 8/10 tool.
Network Engineer at AT&T4.0I use Make to build reliable, scalable API integrations and automations across many apps, saving hundreds of hours and reducing churn by 30%. It’s more cost-effective than Zapier, but needs more connectors, flexible pricing, and better troubleshooting documentation.
Freelancer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees4.0I found Make valuable for medical analysis and PDF conversion, praising its visual debugging, hosting, and error handling. File size limits, complex API modules, and errors halting execution did impact my workflow. I rated it 8/10 for its stability and ROI.
Gtm Operator, Lead Generator at 404Minds Technologies4.5I use Make daily for automating diverse tasks, including GoHighLevel integration and Airbnb scraping, significantly transforming manual work. It saves me substantial time and money, though I experience occasional platform lag and rapid credit consumption.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I used Make to automate backend integrations for an IoT dashboard, saving significant time and money by avoiding custom code and speeding up development. However, debugging complex workflows is challenging, needing better logs and error tracing.