Real java-like hooks into development of the business process model. The Connector implementation is a great addition to an out-of-box solution providing robust features for the developer to build hassle-free integrations. I also really liked the way Bonitasoft lets you define and configure how your connector interface is exposed to others leveraging your custom connector.
Sr. Lead Engineer, Sr. BPM Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Would love for some of the documentation to be better, since there are many great functionalities built into the product
Pros and Cons
- "The Connector implementation is a great addition to an out-of-box solution providing robust features for the developer to build hassle-free integrations."
- "At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Would love for some of the documentation to be better, since there are many great functionalities built into the product!
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
At times Bonita BPM Studio crashes, intermittently.
Buyer's Guide
Bonita
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Bonita. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service:
9
Technical Support:9
How was the initial setup?
No, very straight forward.
What about the implementation team?
In-house.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partners
Enterprise Architect - CEA at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Historically, there was a 'no man's land' between the business analyst and the developer.
Pros and Cons
- "It is more than helpful, it is worth the effort of learning to better our company."
- "The menus likely would be more intuitive if read in French. Things seem to be under strange headings at times."
Valuable Features:
Process modelling and web screen development
Improvements to My Organization:
The major improvement that I see is a paradigm shift to how work should be accomplished over how the industry has always been forced to do the work. Historically, there was a 'no man's land' between the business analyst and the developer. Web developers have been asked to understand the business process models without knowledge that the real business analysts have always had at their finger tips and visa-versa.
BonitaBPM allows the BA's to model the processes and produce the base screens at the same time. This removes the need for back and forth exchanges between the team disciplines, reducing errors and time. It also allows the developers to spend their time doing what they know and are well paid to do, coding.
Room for Improvement:
The menus likely would be more intuitive if read in French. Things seem to be under strange headings at times. With experience this is a minor issue for the gain.
Customer Service:
We only use the open source product, so this is not a real complaint as much as a statement: Support for the open source is only at the highest levels of usage. Getting down to the details is an exercise one needs to plan for or purchase the commercial offering.
Other Advice:
I hope to use this product for many years to come. It is more than helpful, it is worth the effort of learning to better our company.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Bonita
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about Bonita. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Product Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Studio provides an opportunity to get early feedback and quickly change the process and forms.
Pros and Cons
- "Studio provides an opportunity to get early feedback from real users and quickly change the process and forms."
What is most valuable?
- Ease of implementation
- Reduced cycle time to implement a process
- Studio provides an opportunity to get early feedback from real users and quickly change the process and forms
For how long have I used the solution?
7 months
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Good
Technical Support:Excellent
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No previous solutions.
What about the implementation team?
In-house
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Partner with 51-200 employees
Previously, we developed custom business systems. We switched to Bonita because it cut down development time and is easier to demo to prospective clients.
Pros and Cons
- "Our lead generation system involves both automated and human tasks. By centralizing the workflow to our internal Bonita BPM system, we have improved the conversion rate (leads to customers) and lowered the number of leads dropped."
- "That said, creating custom connectors for 3rd party applications and APIs is still a challenging task."
What is most valuable?
With our own processes, we have found the extensible connector system to be very useful (our processes can connect with legacy and 3rd party systems in a simple, well defined way).
When we interact with clients, the BPM workflows from Bonita BPM make defining processes and clarifying system flow much easier. We used to draw system diagrams on whiteboards; now, we create simple models as functional demos.
How has it helped my organization?
Our lead generation system involves both automated and human tasks. By centralizing the workflow to our internal Bonita BPM system, we have improved the conversion rate (leads to customers) and lowered the number of leads dropped. Things do not slip through the cracks any longer.
What needs improvement?
A number of the problem areas that we have run into in the past have been addressed in the newest version (7.0 beta). Things like custom app integration and human task forms have been greatly simplified.
That said, creating custom connectors for 3rd party applications and APIs is still a challenging task. Debugging, in particular, is difficult. I feel that when the development process for custom connectors becomes simpler, there will be many more available connectors.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this software internally and for our clients since 2011
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
We have always deployed servers using Apache Tomcat. Our team is most familiar with this Java Application Server. Since our applications have always run as stand alone systems, this makes sense - if they required a full JEE stack, we would look at JBoss (with it's increased functionality and complexity).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The deployed systems have been fairly stable. Most of the challenges we have run into have been as a result of the hardware and network infrastructures - not as a result of Bonita.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
So far, we have not had to scale beyond a single server install. The software has scaled up to hundreds of concurrent processes and run well on the single server.
How are customer service and technical support?
Generally, the customer service has been great. I have interacted with a number of people at BonitaSoft (Jon Sanchez and Olivia Halaimi stand out in my memory as particularly nice to work with), all have been pleasant and helpful.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we developed custom business systems. We switched to Bonita because it cut down development time and is easier to demo to prospective clients.
How was the initial setup?
The initial install of Bonita Studio is very simple.
The jump from Bonita Studio to a full installation requires a solid understanding of IS and the resources to implement internal server deployments. It's quite a large jump from a demonstration with a desktop studio to even a simple deployment in a real world system.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented with our in-house team.
What was our ROI?
The return on investment is difficult to quantify because Bonita BPM has become tightly integrated in all our internal processes.
I can say that 2014 saw a 50% increase in staffing and an 80% increase in gross revenue over 2013 (when we first implemented Bonita BPM internally). 2015 is on track to show even more significant increases.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We took a look at a number of the open source BPM solutions (including Activiti, JBPM and Drools). We found that Bonita BPM provided the best balance of clarity for non-technical users and development flexibility.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Since the end of 2013, Geek Inc has been a registered Experto partner with BonitaSoft. We do BPM development (processes and connectors) for clients interested in using Bonita BPM.
Sr. Product Manager iApps at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
We like the ease of implementation and how it is user friendly.
Pros and Cons
- "Bonitasoft helped us automate complicated and labor intensive processes"
What is most valuable?
- User friendliness
- Ease of implementation
- Vendor responsiveness
How has it helped my organization?
Bonitasoft helped us automate complicated and labor intensive processes
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Good. Timely and adequate.
Technical Support:Good. Timely and adequate.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No
What about the implementation team?
In-house implementation
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Consultant at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
A BPM platform with a wide range of connectors
Pros and Cons
- "Customer Service: Very good, also the commercial team !Technical Support: Perfect ! and the community is a great help also"
- "The support is mandatory to access all features (Subscription), maybe they can have a different business model."
What is most valuable?
** Collaborative model based on a shared BPM repository ** Business process models and various integrated Look'n'feel Custom ** Assistance for queries creation, connectors and component services ** Java REST API + EJB2/EJB3 and Clustering ** Research data and processes + Error Handling ** Application server Tomcat, JOnAS, JBoss, and Weblogic and other ** Multiple connectors (ERP, CRM, Web Services, Social Networks, ECM, Google products, couriers ... etc..) for free use ** Mobile portal available (rendering and performance not tested yet) ** BPM engine used on platform or isolated ** Research modules on our implemented data and processes
How has it helped my organization?
N/A
What needs improvement?
* The support is mandatory to access all features (Subscription), may they can have a different business model * Requires programming knowledge for implementation and management of heterogeneous connectors. I'll advice to combine some features/connectors for internal offer without using an external editor * Rules engine recently added and with gaps, must be optimized
For how long have I used the solution?
I used Bonita for prototypes and small projects to demonstrate its functionnalities
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Yes, some because lack of knowledge on the product
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I didn't test the product in greater perimeter.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service: Very good, also the commercial team !Technical Support: Perfect ! and the community is a great help also
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No
How was the initial setup?
A little complex for a non initiate person
What about the implementation team?
I was the vendor...
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
N/A
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, for the study. ACTIVITI, IBM BPM and BIZAGI
What other advice do I have?
It's a good product and a rich service behind that
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Software Engineering Team Lead at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Useful detailed documentation, reliable, and beneficial connectors
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
- "Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
- "Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility."
What is our primary use case?
I use Bonita to build web applications.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it.
What needs improvement?
Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Bonita for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Bonita is stable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Camunda previously and Camunda is more lightweight than Bonita.
How was the initial setup?
The initial Bonita is easy, but there are a lot of steps to follow. The setup should be easier for designers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I am using the free version of Bonita.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Bonita a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Bonita Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Popular Comparisons
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
Camunda
Automation Anywhere
Pega Platform
Appian
Bizagi
SAP Signavio Process Manager
IBM BPM
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Visio
ARIS BPA
Hyland OnBase
erwin Data Modeler
Apache Airflow
MEGA HOPEX
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Bonita Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- ARIS, Bonita, and Bizagi -- Do you have a comparison table between them?
- How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
- When evaluating Business Process Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Camunda or Bonitasoft?
- Do you know of a solution which fulfills the requirements listed below?
- Looking for a BPMN tool that is easy to use and reasonably priced
- Which tool do you recommend for business process modeling only?
- Which is the best Workflow Automation Platform with microservices?
- RPA vs BPM: do they complement each other?
- What is the ROI of BPM solutions for a company which currently isn't using one?


















Good review. Thx!