Conga Composer vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Conga and OpenText are both solutions in the Document Management Software category. Conga is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Conga holds a 2.4% mindshare in DMS, compared to OpenText’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Conga Composer

Read 19 Conga Composer reviews

1,568 Views
784 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Manager

Read 23 OpenText Content Manager reviews

4,649 Views
1,534 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Conga Composer

OpenText Content Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conga Composer and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Document Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Conga Composer

Ranking in Document Management Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Automation Software (1st)

OpenText Content Manager

Ranking in Document Management Software

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (9th), File Archiving (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of Conga Composer is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 6.1%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Conga Composer	2.4%
OpenText Content Manager	6.1%
Other	91.5%

Document Management Software

Featured Reviews

Skumar Skumar

Salesforce Application Support Specialist at Vectra AI

Document creation has become faster and more accurate but complex templates still need improvement

In terms of improvements for Conga Composer, we did start seeing a lot of requests related to customization, which were initially difficult. As people got to know that it's very easy to customize it, we started to get those more and more, and we saw fewer errors. Earlier, there were many requests to manually adjust the contract value, which was not possible with the CPQ quote documents. With Conga Composer, we can customize it to some level. For exception cases, we can modify the template and generate the contract in a way they want it. While we did not record any metrics, looking at the overall tickets and the reduction in errors we used to see, I think it has improved efficiency by a lot, and our stakeholders agree. However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping. Some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long. We jumped on their support, but we could not come to a resolution, so we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template. I think Conga Composer could improve its adoption for Conga Composer Sign. Right now, the adoption is not very great. People use Conga Composer mainly for document generation and then go separately for DocuSign. To get a better hold of the market, Conga should definitely invest more into Conga Composer Sign.

Read full review

Maurice Riverso

Records Management Officer at ANZPAA

Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management

The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an implementer, what stands out for me is that I've been on it for more than ten years now, so I kind of saw some change in the UI, and it's very nice."

"Conga Composer offers extensive customization and flexibility, that allows us to create documents that perfectly align with our branding and specific business requirements."

"Conga Composer is easy to use, especially for C-level executives, as it simplifies the contract signing process."

"Once you understand how to build the templates, it's a pretty straightforward process. It allows you to create both Word and Excel documents."

"I like Conga Composer because it's simple and flexible. I can manage complex formatting and queries easily and integrate it with other tools like DocuSign for the signing process. I’ve used it in Salesforce by installing the Conga Composer package, creating Conga solutions, queries, templates, and using different parameters. Integration with DocuSign allows me to send documents for signatures with just one click, which has greatly improved workflows. By automating processes, such as generating quotes, it has reduced human errors significantly. I also find the ability to generate documents in various formats like PowerPoint, Excel, and Word very useful. However, I haven't worked with its AI capabilities yet."

"What I like about Conga Composer is that it's much easier than Salesforce's native templating. It's simple to add merge fields, write queries to pull data and access up to four levels of related objects. This makes it very comfortable to get all the needed data into templates."

"The initial setup of Conga Composer is easy."

"In my 2.5 years of experience with Conga Composer, I can say that it was one of the best document generation tools that I have used in a very long time."

More Conga Composer pros

"For a records management system, Content Manager is a really good system."

"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."

"The product can be integrated with different solutions."

"It helps us in terms of efficiency when working with multiple people at the same time, on the same case."

"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."

"There many ways that this application has improved our organization. The most significant is the reduction in paper generation and the ability to electronically annotate and manage all our documents."

"The most valuable features of OpenText Content Manager are its stability, reliability, security, and workflow engine."

"This creates a more sustainable, competitive, government compliant, and secure solution in the long term which pays off on the investment."

Cons

"The biggest area where Conga needs improvement is its documentation. The documentation is good but not up to par with other platforms like Salesforce, which has extensive documentation and a helpful community."

"The query builder could use some updates."

"However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping; some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long, and even after working with support we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template."

"The debugging skills could be improved as we need to stay alert for issues."

"One downside of Conga Composer is that it requires integration with other tools for the signing process. Apart from that, I find nothing major to be improved."

"It would be better to have a custom button that automatically sends a document to the client's email and sends it for a signature with a single click."

"Conga is getting more and more expensive."

"The only improvement I'd like to see is the ability to hide a single column within a grouped table, which I couldn't figure out how to do."

More Conga Composer cons

"We now have 2 proxies, 5 distribution servers and about 40 IDOL engines with tons of data on CEs. It is a scalable solution, but we see performance degradation and maintenance nightmares."

"It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft."

"Generally speaking, HPE’s support for the product has been weak since the acquisition from TOWER Software."

"Functionality gets removed as new versions are released."

"We've had it for a year now, and since we started implementation it has been, to say softly, a nightmare."

"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."

"The ease of use should be addressed. If one is skillful then this will not present a problem, but a person who is not will be forced to struggle."

"The ease of use should be addressed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the tool costs around six dollars per user."

"Regarding pricing, I believe it’s around fifty dollars, but I’m not entirely sure. Overall, I find the pricing reasonable and am quite satisfied with the product. The value we get from it justifies the cost, as it requires minimal maintenance and is straightforward to use. The functionality it provides aligns well with the investment."

"It's not cheap, but it's not overly expensive either."

"The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."

"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."

"I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."

"The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Composer?

Not Sure, As i implemented the Quote Documents as per business need but client directly buy it for salesforce

See all answers

What needs improvement with Conga Composer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Conga Composer?

One of the main use cases for Conga Composer would be to generate quote documents. We had different types of quote documents in our business process, so we used different kinds of Conga Composer te...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Content Manager?

We are a system integrator. We deal with client requirements to determine the best solutions that should be deployed. Our primary use case for OpenText Content Manager is managing enterprise conten...

See all answers

Comparisons

SS&C Blue Prism vs Conga Composer

Compared 12% of the time

Box vs Conga Composer

Compared 9% of the time

DocuWare vs Conga Composer

Compared 8% of the time

DocuSign Gen vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

CA View vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More Conga Composer Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Content Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer

August 2026

Download Conga Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager

July 2026

Download OpenText Content Manager product report

Also Known As

Conga

Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager

Overview

Conga Composer offers a powerful document generation tool with seamless Salesforce integration and dynamic data merging, allowing users to create customized templates for efficient workflows.

Featuring an intuitive interface, Conga Composer streamlines document creation through automation, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. Integrating with Salesforce, it supports dynamic data merging and customizable templates for Word and Excel. E-signature incorporation and multilingual support provide added functionality. Despite its capabilities, users note concerns over cost, documentation depth, and integration challenges beyond Salesforce. Improvements in template management, user guidance, and debugging support could enhance its usability.

What are the key features?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies document creation.
Seamless Salesforce Integration: Allows for smooth data merging and document generation within Salesforce.
Customizable Templates: Provides flexibility with Word and Excel templates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances accuracy in workflows.
E-signature Support: Facilitates digital signing processes.
Multilingual Functionality: Supports multiple languages for broad applicability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and dynamic data merging enhance productivity.
Improved Accuracy: Reduces errors in document creation with customizable templates.
Streamlined Workflows: Simplifies processes through integration with platforms like Salesforce.
Enhanced Functionality: Offers flexibility with e-signatures and multilingual support.

Conga Composer is widely applied in sectors like healthcare and finance, automating document creation for invoices, proposals, and reports. It integrates seamlessly with DocuSign for e-signatures, focusing on improving document accuracy and customization for different applications.

Conga

OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.

OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.

What are the key features?

Search and Retrieval: Efficiently locate documents with advanced metadata options.
Security Features: Robust controls for safeguarding sensitive data.
Retention Management: Automates lifecycle rules for document retention.
Workflow Capabilities: Streamlines approval processes and document handling.
Integration: Works with SharePoint, Microsoft Office, and other platforms.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficient Document Management: Reduction in time spent searching and managing records.
Compliance Assurance: Keeps up with regulatory standards and automates compliance tasks.
Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments, offering flexibility.
Improved Data Security: Enhances security protocols and audit trails.

In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Arkus, CollegeTracks, Colorado Creative Industries, Davies Office, Delta Air, Depersico, Diagnostic Innovations, Digital Dolphin, Finnzymes

Missouri State Courts

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

June 2026

Free Report: Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager report.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.