Conga Composer vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Conga and OpenText are both solutions in the Document Management Software category. Conga is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5. Conga holds a 2.8% mindshare in DMS, compared to OpenText’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Conga Composer

Read 19 Conga Composer reviews

2,024 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Manager

Read 23 OpenText Content Manager reviews

5,742 Views
1,895 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Conga Composer

OpenText Content Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conga Composer and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Document Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Conga Composer

Ranking in Document Management Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Automation Software (1st)

OpenText Content Manager

Ranking in Document Management Software

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (13th), File Archiving (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of Conga Composer is 2.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 6.1%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Conga Composer	2.8%
OpenText Content Manager	6.1%
Other	91.1%

Document Management Software

Featured Reviews

Skumar Skumar

Salesforce Application Support Specialist at Vectra AI

Document creation has become faster and more accurate but complex templates still need improvement

In terms of improvements for Conga Composer, we did start seeing a lot of requests related to customization, which were initially difficult. As people got to know that it's very easy to customize it, we started to get those more and more, and we saw fewer errors. Earlier, there were many requests to manually adjust the contract value, which was not possible with the CPQ quote documents. With Conga Composer, we can customize it to some level. For exception cases, we can modify the template and generate the contract in a way they want it. While we did not record any metrics, looking at the overall tickets and the reduction in errors we used to see, I think it has improved efficiency by a lot, and our stakeholders agree. However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping. Some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long. We jumped on their support, but we could not come to a resolution, so we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template. I think Conga Composer could improve its adoption for Conga Composer Sign. Right now, the adoption is not very great. People use Conga Composer mainly for document generation and then go separately for DocuSign. To get a better hold of the market, Conga should definitely invest more into Conga Composer Sign.

Read full review

Maurice Riverso

Records Management Officer at ANZPAA

Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management

The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the automatic generation of invoices and the ability to merge fields from Salesforce into the document, creating a clean and professional invoice."

"I like that Conga Composer allows for the generation of PDFs according to specific requirements by creating templates and pulling all the information added into those fields."

"The main benefits I have seen from using Conga Composer are that while Salesforce provides features to build documents or cases that function as quote summaries, they have limitations, and after choosing Conga, we discovered that it already has many features that enable us to easily build complex templates and it works perfectly with our business use cases, which is why we selected it."

"It's quite simple."

"I have never faced any issues with stability."

"Using Conga Composer helps us send proposals much faster—within minutes instead of hours—thus improving our sales cycle by roughly twenty to thirty percent."

"The initial setup of Conga Composer is easy."

"I like Conga Composer because it's simple and flexible. I can manage complex formatting and queries easily and integrate it with other tools like DocuSign for the signing process. I’ve used it in Salesforce by installing the Conga Composer package, creating Conga solutions, queries, templates, and using different parameters. Integration with DocuSign allows me to send documents for signatures with just one click, which has greatly improved workflows. By automating processes, such as generating quotes, it has reduced human errors significantly. I also find the ability to generate documents in various formats like PowerPoint, Excel, and Word very useful. However, I haven't worked with its AI capabilities yet."

More Conga Composer pros

"Customer Service: We appreciate HPE's team of resources, who assist us as issues arise."

"The product allows us to run our Notice of Destructions seamlessly and produces our annual folders with ease."

"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."

"We are required to have a robust Records Management system, and it does this job."

"HPE Content Manager provides organizations with a reliable system for managing massive amounts of information, in a structured, compliant and secure way, with a level of functionality and reliability that I have not seen matched by custom-built or other systems."

"Go for it."

"Sharing of documents, reduction of duplication, and the ability to manage retention, disposition and overall records management have been significant benefits for our organization."

"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."

Cons

"The only improvement I'd like to see is the ability to hide a single column within a grouped table, which I couldn't figure out how to do."

"Honestly, when I was a consultant, Conga Composer was okay, but then when you went a bit outside and wanted to take Conga Sign, which was called Conga Sign back then, but maybe they changed the name now, all those things were getting very expensive."

"We have not been using Conga Composer extensively or deeply to look for improvements."

"The debugging skills could be improved as we need to stay alert for issues."

"When setting conditions, it doesn't work as expected, requiring us to rework the code."

"Conga is getting more and more expensive."

"However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping; some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long, and even after working with support we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template."

"The initial setup is at an intermediate level of difficulty since understanding Conga Composer for the first time can be confusing."

More Conga Composer cons

"We have not yet utilized the web version, as we encountered a few issues during testing."

"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."

"We now have 2 proxies, 5 distribution servers and about 40 IDOL engines with tons of data on CEs. It is a scalable solution, but we see performance degradation and maintenance nightmares."

"This system eats up a lot of staff time for support, administration, and use."

"Microsoft Office disabling the HPE Records Manager integration is an issue."

"Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."

"The system is difficult to navigate and understand the full scope of functionality available for end users to appreciate the value."

"The ease of use should be addressed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the tool costs around six dollars per user."

"Regarding pricing, I believe it’s around fifty dollars, but I’m not entirely sure. Overall, I find the pricing reasonable and am quite satisfied with the product. The value we get from it justifies the cost, as it requires minimal maintenance and is straightforward to use. The functionality it provides aligns well with the investment."

"It's not cheap, but it's not overly expensive either."

"I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."

"The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."

"The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Composer?

Not Sure, As i implemented the Quote Documents as per business need but client directly buy it for salesforce

See all answers

What needs improvement with Conga Composer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Conga Composer?

One of the main use cases for Conga Composer would be to generate quote documents. We had different types of quote documents in our business process, so we used different kinds of Conga Composer te...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Conga Composer

Compared 10% of the time

CA View vs Conga Composer

Compared 9% of the time

SS&C Blue Prism vs Conga Composer

Compared 9% of the time

DocuWare vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Docmosis vs Conga Composer

Compared 3% of the time

More Conga Composer Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Content Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer

October 2026

Download Conga Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager

October 2026

Download OpenText Content Manager product report

Also Known As

Conga

Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager

Overview

Conga Composer offers a powerful document generation tool with seamless Salesforce integration and dynamic data merging, allowing users to create customized templates for efficient workflows.

Featuring an intuitive interface, Conga Composer streamlines document creation through automation, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. Integrating with Salesforce, it supports dynamic data merging and customizable templates for Word and Excel. E-signature incorporation and multilingual support provide added functionality. Despite its capabilities, users note concerns over cost, documentation depth, and integration challenges beyond Salesforce. Improvements in template management, user guidance, and debugging support could enhance its usability.

What are the key features?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies document creation.
Seamless Salesforce Integration: Allows for smooth data merging and document generation within Salesforce.
Customizable Templates: Provides flexibility with Word and Excel templates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances accuracy in workflows.
E-signature Support: Facilitates digital signing processes.
Multilingual Functionality: Supports multiple languages for broad applicability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and dynamic data merging enhance productivity.
Improved Accuracy: Reduces errors in document creation with customizable templates.
Streamlined Workflows: Simplifies processes through integration with platforms like Salesforce.
Enhanced Functionality: Offers flexibility with e-signatures and multilingual support.

Conga Composer is widely applied in sectors like healthcare and finance, automating document creation for invoices, proposals, and reports. It integrates seamlessly with DocuSign for e-signatures, focusing on improving document accuracy and customization for different applications.

Conga

OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.

OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.

What are the key features?

Search and Retrieval: Efficiently locate documents with advanced metadata options.
Security Features: Robust controls for safeguarding sensitive data.
Retention Management: Automates lifecycle rules for document retention.
Workflow Capabilities: Streamlines approval processes and document handling.
Integration: Works with SharePoint, Microsoft Office, and other platforms.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficient Document Management: Reduction in time spent searching and managing records.
Compliance Assurance: Keeps up with regulatory standards and automates compliance tasks.
Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments, offering flexibility.
Improved Data Security: Enhances security protocols and audit trails.

In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Arkus, CollegeTracks, Colorado Creative Industries, Davies Office, Delta Air, Depersico, Diagnostic Innovations, Digital Dolphin, Finnzymes

Missouri State Courts

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager report.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.