Jira Reviews

We use Jira as a help desk, an IDSM. We use it on a daily basis. Every ticket gets opened on it.

It's very simple to change the workflow and adapt it. Jira is very user friendly for the agent and the user.

It's a very customizable solution, but as a customer, we're always looking for additional customization. There could be better customization in future releases. If we changed from Atlassian to another product, we would look for a customizable solution.

I have been using this solution for many years.

The stability of Jira is good. We haven't had any issues with stability or performance.

It's a license-based software, so if you pay more for the license, the solution becomes more scalable.

Customer support is usually good. I have had no issues with them. 

Setup was straightforward. There is no dedicated team for maintenance. Our IT department handles that. It's a simple solution.

There are no additional costs to the standard licensing.

I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. I recommend Jira. For the time being, everything is good. Their support is good. The platform is good. There are no issues with them on any level. We mainly picked Jira because of its stability, integration, and price. If a solution is well integrated in our environment, and it's not costly, why not configure it?

The biggest thing I have taken away from working with Jira is that it's very simple.

As a lead consultant, I assess the testing maturity and suggest how our clients can improve what they're doing. I also carry out training sessions for Jira and other solutions as to how they can effectively use the solution. 

I like the ease with which we can do our workflow administration, especially with respect to defects. We can do good work with the boards, whether it's a Kanban or a Scrum board. It's much easier with Jira than with other tools. 

The solution could be improved with respect to how the end-to-end is managed from product backlog creation until test completion. Although it can be customized, if there was a standard out-of-view box feature or a workflow, that would be helpful. There are features that are currently not out of the box and lack end-to-end traceability, such as the business value of a particular feature. It would be great if that were included. 

I've been using this solution for over two and a half years. 

The product is stable. 

We are currently working with an enterprise client and we are able to scale easily. 

Jira's technical support is good. 

I previously used HP ALM, as well as TestRail, which is now focused more on test management. ALM was the major tool that I used before we started using Jira.

The licensing costs are reasonable. 

This tool has good capabilities but you really need to know what you want to do and freeze down your requirements before using it. It can be challenging when people don't understand the difference between Kanban and Scrum, and how you use those boards effectively. 

I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

Our company is a consulting company and then we are an Atlassian partner as well. Therefore we use many functions of Jira. It's sometimes project management and sometimes to communicate to outside customers.

The solution is very fast.

It's a very useful tool. Jira is very useful for project management for internal projects. 

We can easily communicate with many things easily in Jira.

There's the ability to easily customize the product. There's lots of great potential functionality.

The solution is stable.

You can scale the product very well.

We'd like to see more collaboration tools implemented within the product itself. 

The product needs to allow for more communication between individuals and teams. 

The solution could always use better reporting. 

I've been using the solution for four or five years. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. 

This is the type of tool that would work well for any size of organization, from a smaller company to a very large enterprise. 

The product is very easy to scale and extend the user license. In terms of functional expansion, for projects, it's very easy to expand. You can do so in no time. It's very quick.

For the most part, we are satisfied with technical support. Sometimes in some areas, if you find a bug on Atlassian, they respond quickly. However, sometimes, they are slower. It can really vary. For the most part, they really try to get to things quickly. 

The initial setup is different and is case by case, however, for a single person or scrum team, it's not too hard. The process is simpler on smaller setups. The more processes the company needs, the more complicated the solution gets during implementation. 

We have our own engineer team internally that handles maintenance. We have no problem with maintenance tasks. It's not too hard to handle. 

We provide implementation services to our customers.

Jira pricing is very difficult to pin down. They stopped another licensing version earlier in the year, in February. Now they have only data center licenses and then cloud licenses. These are more expensive than a server license. With a server license, you pay once. When you get a cloud license, it's an ongoing annual cost. We would have preferred if the old licensing model was kept.

We are Atlassian partners. 

We are using the current version, the latest version right now.

We use both cloud or on-premises deployment models. It's a hybrid approach.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I'd recommend the product to other users. 

The way it interfaces with Bitbucket and other things like that is valuable. Reporting and being able to link various issues or stories together are also valuable. We call them stories, and they're general reports.

I never had an issue with it at all. Everything I needed to do was always there. Everything is cool.

It should have Behavior Driven Development (BDD). There should be an option to add macros to help with that. A lot of people are using it now, and it would be nice if there was a way in there to be able to generate the BDD of commands whenever you're creating a story.

I have been using this solution for probably 8 to 10 years. I have used it at different companies. Cloud is the way they had it set up.

There were probably about 600 users, and they were from top management and all the way down to the testers. So, pretty much everybody used it.

I would rate it at least a 9 out of 10. That's because I never had any issues with it. It always did what I needed it to do.

We use Jira in our organization for lifecycle management.

The solution has helped our organization do lifecycle management easily.

I have found the most valuable features of Jira to be ticketing, life cycle workflow, definition, and creation. Many of the features are useful.

The solution could improve by having its own tool for quality lifecycle management.

I have used Jira for approximately nine years.

The stability of Jira is good.

Jira has good scalability.

We are using this solution extensively. We have more than 5,000 using the solution in my organization.

We have been satisfied with the technical support from Jira.

We have used in-house developed tools previously and we had to do a lot of customization and this is why we moved to Jira.

I would recommend this solution to others, it is a good option.

I rate Jira an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for our own projects.

The solution, for the most part, offers good usability.

The ordinary user has an interface that is very clear.

It's very easy to collaborate, especially on-site when there are a lot of moving pieces. It's a great collaboration tool.

Some of the interfaces, especially on the administrator side and for permissions, are not so clear. They aren't very user-friendly.

For admin to get permissions and stuff like that for their members it's a little confusing sometimes. That said, the rest is very clear.

The integration of what we call "Issues" in Jira could be better. The Issues integration with Bitbucket Pipelines could be better. If Jira can provide an easier way to configure and use this functionality, that will be helpful for workers.

I've been using Jira for more than ten years now. It's been a while at this point. 

I looked at other options, however, Jira is so famous and well known that I did not have to look for other software.

We are a customer and an end-user. We use Jira for internal projects. I'm a Java architect.

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. I'm very satisfied with its capabilities. 

We use this solution to manage our projects.

Jira is a great software. There is not much to complain about, other than it doesn't fit very well into our current Microsoft environment.

Jira as a structure has Confluence for documentation, and for what it is offering it is a strong suit with Atlassian.

The only thing in our current setup that is a bit difficult is that Jira is a bit of a black box. Only we see it, our customers do not. I know that we can change it but we have not done the work to do it.

Jira is not compatible with our current Microsoft infrastructure. 

We are using SharePoint along with WorkPoint in our environment, which is used for document management and process management. For projects, it is a better connection between HelpDesk and the projects. Moving into SharePoint would help.

If Jira would be interested in offering a SharePoint version, it would be beneficial.

I have been working with Jira for approximately five years.

Jira is a stable product.

We have approximately 50 users in our company who use Jira.

I am satisfied with the technical support of Jira. It's fine.

I have tested Plumsail Helpdesk. There's only one thing that worries me. Due to GDPR, we cannot use email yet in Plumsail. That is the only thing, use email to create tickets.

I don't know where the mailbox is in Plumsail, otherwise, it just ends up in us using SharePoint. It looks very promising.

It is very affordable at the entry-level. When you get larger, the pricing becomes very, very steep. It is the same for many other solutions, but I find it expensive when you get larger.

We are currently using Jira but want to move the help desk to SharePoint. 

We have a Microsoft environment. SharePoint HelpDesk would fit better into our environment. As we are larger than we originally started, we have to make some changes to our current setup.

I also find Plumsail HelpDesk quite interesting.

I don't know what to compare it to. It is not an A product, but it's a strong piece.

I would rate Jira an eight out of ten.

We use Jira to manage our software development lifecycle. Additionally, it can be used to communicate between teams and as a management tool, it has many abilities.

The solution is easy to use and user-friendly.

I have been using Jira for approximately 10 years. 

Jira is highly stable.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 400 people using the solution in my organization.

The technical support is very good. They have different ways to get in contact with the support, such as chat.

The installation took a couple of weeks. It was a distributed architecture that was quite easy to implement.

We are on an annual license and could be less expensive.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Jira a ten out of ten.