Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Portnox Logo

Top 10 Portnox Alternatives

Vendor: Portnox Security
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Portnox Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Portnox based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), and Aruba ClearPass. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Portnox surpasses its competitors by offering seamless network security with advanced features like real-time visibility, automated threat response, and easy integration, ensuring comprehensive protection and minimizing vulnerabilities across diverse IT environments.

Portnox Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Portnox Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Portnox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Portnox offers advantages in pricing, ease of use, and integration, making it appealing for small to medium-sized enterprises. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate provides extensive threat protection and high-performance security, making it suitable for organizations requiring advanced security and efficiency at scale.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Fortinet FortiGate presents varying setup expenses based on the chosen configuration and features. Portnox's cost transparency may appeal to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Fortinet FortiGate presents varying setup expenses based on the chosen configuration and features. Portnox's cost transparency may appeal to budget-conscious users.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
4.1 out of 5
Portnox attracts tech buyers with its flexible, cloud-based solution and strong customer support. In comparison, Cisco ISE appeals to those seeking a comprehensive feature set for complex enterprise environments. Cisco's higher costs are offset by potential high ROI through advanced security capabilities.
Download Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers lower setup costs compared to Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), which is often noted for higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers lower setup costs compared to Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), which is often noted for higher initial expenses.
Portnox Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Portnox is valued for cost-effectiveness and quick deployment with cloud-based management. In comparison, Aruba ClearPass excels with advanced policy management and robust security protocols. Portnox suits small to medium businesses, while Aruba ClearPass serves enterprises focusing on long-term, comprehensive security solutions.
Download Aruba ClearPass vs. Portnox Report
Portnox has minimal setup costs, offering a straightforward initial implementation, whereas Aruba ClearPass involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its complex deployment process. These distinctions highlight a variance in cost-effectiveness for different infrastructure scales.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has minimal setup costs, offering a straightforward initial implementation, whereas Aruba ClearPass involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its complex deployment process. These distinctions highlight a variance in cost-effectiveness for different infrastructure scales.
Portnox Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
Portnox, with its cloud-native architecture, offers flexibility and ease of integration, ideal for mid-sized businesses. In comparison, Fortinet FortiNAC provides comprehensive security features suitable for larger enterprises, justifying higher initial investments with its extensive threat response and endpoint visibility.
Download Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC presents a higher setup cost but with a more robust infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC presents a higher setup cost but with a more robust infrastructure.
Portnox Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Portnox is attractive for its competitive pricing and cloud-based simplicity. In comparison, Forescout Platform offers extensive device management and integration for complex networks, appealing to organizations needing advanced features despite its higher initial cost and potentially more intricate deployment process.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Forescout Platform involves higher upfront expenses but provides extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Forescout Platform involves higher upfront expenses but provides extensive features.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Portnox offers flexible deployment and competitive pricing, excelling in diverse IT environments through seamless network access control and policy enforcement. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes robust zero trust security with application control, ideal for tech buyers prioritizing endpoint protection and network integrity.
Download Portnox vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
Portnox offers a highly affordable setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform presents a premium pricing for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a highly affordable setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform presents a premium pricing for initial deployment.
Portnox Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Portnox offers ease of deployment with strong endpoint visibility and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Appgate SDP provides advanced Zero Trust Network Access architecture and superior security features. Tech buyers may choose Portnox for practicality or Appgate SDP for robust security controls and long-term value.
Download Appgate SDP vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a lower setup cost compared to Appgate SDP, making it a more budget-friendly choice; however, Appgate SDP provides more robust features that could justify its higher expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a lower setup cost compared to Appgate SDP, making it a more budget-friendly choice; however, Appgate SDP provides more robust features that could justify its higher expense.
Portnox Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Portnox appeals for its comprehensive network access control, robust support, and potential for long-term ROI with substantial features. In comparison, Twingate attracts tech buyers with its agile remote access, Zero Trust architecture, and cost-effective deployment, prioritizing streamlined, cloud-based solutions.
Portnox's setup cost is straightforward and potentially lower than Twingate, which may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox's setup cost is straightforward and potentially lower than Twingate, which may involve higher initial expenses.
Portnox Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
Portnox Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
Portnox provides better pricing and customer support value. In comparison, NordLayer offers comprehensive security features. Portnox focuses on intuitive network control, while NordLayer emphasizes advanced threat detection. Portnox is budget-friendly; NordLayer appeals to those requiring in-depth protection.
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with no initial costs, while NordLayer requires an upfront investment. These cost differences could significantly impact initial budgeting considerations for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with no initial costs, while NordLayer requires an upfront investment. These cost differences could significantly impact initial budgeting considerations for potential users.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
macmon Network Access Control
4.3 out of 5
Portnox offers cost-effective, cloud-based solutions with straightforward deployment, while macmon Network Access Control provides advanced identity management and automation features. In comparison, macmon suits complex enterprises with robust on-premise deployment, whereas Portnox appeals to businesses seeking simplicity and quick ROI.
Download Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control Report
Portnox has low setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users, while macmon Network Access Control's setup costs are higher, which may indicate more robust initial features.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has low setup costs appealing to budget-conscious users, while macmon Network Access Control's setup costs are higher, which may indicate more robust initial features.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
3.5 out of 5
Portnox excels in intuitive policy management and seamless integration, appealing for quick deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Symantec ZTNA is favored for its advanced threat detection and extensive support network, making it suitable for enterprises requiring comprehensive security measures and robust deployment guidance.
Portnox offers competitive setup costs that appeal to budget-conscious businesses, while Symantec ZTNA provides a premium setup experience with a comprehensive feature set, highlighting a contrast in initial investment for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers competitive setup costs that appeal to budget-conscious businesses, while Symantec ZTNA provides a premium setup experience with a comprehensive feature set, highlighting a contrast in initial investment for potential users.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Sophos Network Access Control
4.2 out of 5
Portnox attracts buyers with ease of integration and a cloud-based system. In comparison, Sophos Network Access Control provides threat protection suited for comprehensive security needs. Portnox's pricing suits smaller budgets, while Sophos warrants investment through its advanced features.
Download Portnox vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Sophos Network Access Control has a higher setup cost with more complex configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Sophos Network Access Control has a higher setup cost with more complex configuration requirements.
Portnox Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath
3.8 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath
3.8 out of 5
Portnox simplifies network access with easy onboarding and quick deployment, appealing to fast-paced environments. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath offers advanced security features and detailed customization, suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive network security at a higher cost. Portnox attracts budget-conscious buyers; Ruckus caters to feature-prioritizing businesses.
Download Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report
Portnox has a straightforward and low-cost setup, while Ruckus Cloudpath involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs may impact decision-making.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has a straightforward and low-cost setup, while Ruckus Cloudpath involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment. These differences in setup costs may impact decision-making.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
4.2 out of 5
Portnox offers cost-effectiveness with robust network access control and straightforward deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious entities. In comparison, Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy provides superior features and integration within the cloud ecosystem, justifying its cost with enhanced security and comprehensive functionality.
Download Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy may require more investment upfront, highlighting a key difference in setup expenses between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy may require more investment upfront, highlighting a key difference in setup expenses between these solutions.
Portnox Logo
Ivanti NAC
3.8 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Ivanti NAC
3.8 out of 5
Portnox offers competitive pricing and excellent support, which simplifies deployment and boosts ROI. In comparison, Ivanti NAC excels with advanced feature sets, offering robust endpoint control and security policy enforcement, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive network security over cost considerations.
Download Ivanti NAC vs. Portnox Report
Portnox setup costs are lower, offering a cost-effective solution, while Ivanti NAC requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox setup costs are lower, offering a cost-effective solution, while Ivanti NAC requires a higher initial investment.
Portnox Logo
Genian NAC
1 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Genian NAC
1 out of 5
Portnox offers a cloud-based platform with real-time monitoring and ease of integration, appealing to those seeking simplicity and strong support. In comparison, Genian NAC attracts with its comprehensive asset visibility and robust security, justifying higher pricing with extensive long-term benefits.
Portnox offers a straightforward setup process with transparent costs, while Genian NAC presents a more detailed and potentially higher initial setup investment. Users can expect diverse cost structures reflecting these distinct approaches to implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup process with transparent costs, while Genian NAC presents a more detailed and potentially higher initial setup investment. Users can expect diverse cost structures reflecting these distinct approaches to implementation.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Citrix Secure Private Access
4.2 out of 5
Portnox focuses on network visibility and automated threat response, appealing to those valuing seamless integration. In comparison, Citrix Secure Private Access targets comprehensive security and remote workforce support, ideal for businesses prioritizing advanced security controls despite higher costs.
Download Citrix Secure Private Access vs. Portnox Report
Portnox requires a lower setup cost compared to Citrix Secure Private Access, which involves a more complex initial investment. This disparity highlights Portnox's affordability, while Citrix demands consideration for a potentially higher expense upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox requires a lower setup cost compared to Citrix Secure Private Access, which involves a more complex initial investment. This disparity highlights Portnox's affordability, while Citrix demands consideration for a potentially higher expense upfront.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
SecureW2 JoinNow
1 out of 5
Portnox provides intuitive control dashboards and flexible on-premises deployment, appealing to organizations prioritizing pricing and support. In comparison, SecureW2 JoinNow offers robust certificate-based security and seamless cloud integration, attracting businesses seeking advanced features and streamlined processes. SecureW2 JoinNow emphasizes long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
Portnox has a notably lower setup cost compared to SecureW2 JoinNow, which might be an attractive factor for those managing stringent budgets. SecureW2 JoinNow offers more advanced features upfront, which reflects in its higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has a notably lower setup cost compared to SecureW2 JoinNow, which might be an attractive factor for those managing stringent budgets. SecureW2 JoinNow offers more advanced features upfront, which reflects in its higher initial setup cost.
Portnox Logo
Keytos
1 out of 5
Portnox Logo
Keytos
1 out of 5
Portnox's flexible pricing and ease of deployment cater to budget-conscious buyers seeking integration simplicity. In comparison, Keytos, with its advanced encryption and cloud security, suits businesses prioritizing sophisticated security. Portnox appeals with affordability, while Keytos targets those investing in superior features.
Portnox offers cost-effective setup compared to Keytos, which might incur higher initial expenses. Keytos provides comprehensive service inclusions in its setup package, contrasting with Portnox's leaner initial cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers cost-effective setup compared to Keytos, which might incur higher initial expenses. Keytos provides comprehensive service inclusions in its setup package, contrasting with Portnox's leaner initial cost structure.
Portnox Logo
SecureW2
1 out of 5
Portnox Logo
SecureW2
1 out of 5
Portnox excels in flexible network access control and compliance, attracting cost-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and proactive customer service. In comparison, SecureW2’s advanced certificate-based security and robust authentication solutions justify its higher cost, appealing to organizations seeking feature-rich environments for long-term security benefits.
Portnox offers a competitive setup cost, whereas SecureW2's setup cost is noted for being slightly higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a competitive setup cost, whereas SecureW2's setup cost is noted for being slightly higher.
Portnox Logo
Portnox Logo
Tempered Airwall
1 out of 5
Portnox excels in pricing and customer support with efficient network access control. In comparison, Tempered Airwall, though more costly, offers advanced security features like micro-segmentation, appealing to organizations requiring robust protection. Portnox's straightforward deployment is ideal for minimal disruption.
Portnox has lower setup costs compared to Tempered Airwall, offering a more cost-effective solution initially. Tempered Airwall's setup may involve higher costs, but it offers robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox has lower setup costs compared to Tempered Airwall, offering a more cost-effective solution initially. Tempered Airwall's setup may involve higher costs, but it offers robust security features.

Related categories

Network Access Control (NAC)
ZTNA
Passwordless Authentication