My customers use Ruckus Wireless for computing, data transfer, and internet access.
Sales Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
An affordable wireless solution, but integration could be better
Pros and Cons
- "I like the price and its capacity."
- "My customers use Ruckus Wireless for computing, data transfer, and internet access."
- "The initial setup could be more straightforward. It would be better if we could seamlessly integrate security tools like a firewall or IPS with Ruckus Wireless."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I like the price and its capacity.
What needs improvement?
The initial setup could be more straightforward. It would be better if we could seamlessly integrate security tools like a firewall or IPS with Ruckus Wireless.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Ruckus Wireless for almost ten years.
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is scalable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Ruckus Wireless pricing is reasonable.
On a scale from one to five, I would give Ruckus Wireless pricing a four.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Ruckus Wireless a seven.
Although this product is a very good wireless solution and good for my customers over here, I still have to deal with poor integration.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Integration Manager at Newcom
Easy to set up with good reliability and responsive technical support
Pros and Cons
- "In general, all implementations are standard and pretty straightforward."
- "Technical support has been very good; in any situation where I have had to reach out, they have been quick to respond and my issues were resolved in a timely manner."
- "The solution could include more security features."
What is our primary use case?
We are an integrator; our function is to sell Ruckus solutions to our clients and to implement the solution for them. It's a good solution for wireless WiFi connectivity.
What is most valuable?
Our clients are in the hospitality industry and it's been very good at meeting their needs. The WiFi connections are good.
In general, all implementations are standard and pretty straightforward. These implementations typically cover the connection to the corporate network integrated with Microsoft's Active Directory and other services that bring network access to the clients so that it's easy to get onto the internet.
The stability has been good.
We find the solution to be scalable.
Technical support is responsive and knowledgeable.
What needs improvement?
The solution could include more security features. For example, with other solutions, there is a security feature added to connect to the internet. In the case of Ruckus, they don't have any security solution to connect to the internet. Clients want more security, which is why it's important Ruckus begins to think of ways to offer more robust connection options that will help customers feel safer.
For how long have I used the solution?
Just two weeks ago I implemented a Ruckus Wireless solution for our client. I deal with it regularly. In general, I have about three years of experience with the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is great. It's reliable and the performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution has scaled well. A customer shouldn't have any issues expanding the product.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support has been very good. In any situation where I have had to reach out, they have been quick to respond and my issues were resolved in a timely manner. We are quite satisfied with their level of attention and knowledge.
How was the initial setup?
The initial implementations have been standard and straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult.
What about the implementation team?
As integrators, we are able to assist our clients in the initial setup process.
What other advice do I have?
We are integrator of Ruckus. We offer Ruckus solutions to our clients.
I'm not sure of the exact version number I last installed, however, it was the latest solution that covers smartphones. It had the wireless controller of Ruckus and different equipment covering WiFi 5 and WiFi 6.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I'd give it a rating of nine out of ten. We've been very pleased with it overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Solution Manager at Cibercol Informatica
It offers wider coverage than comparable solutions, with good support and pricing
Pros and Cons
- "The biggest advantages of Ruckus Wireless are pricing and support."
- "I think it would be nice if Ruckus offered the option of a cloud interface for easy configuration of Ruckus Wireless."
What is most valuable?
The biggest advantages of Ruckus Wireless are pricing and support.
What needs improvement?
I think it would be nice if Ruckus offered the option of a cloud interface for easy configuration of Ruckus Wireless.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using Ruckus Wireless for three months. Our company is a Ruckus integrator.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I've only worked with Ruckus Wireless, and it's okay for me. We've had no problems with stability.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at other vendors, and I think Ruckus Wireless offered a larger range.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Ruckus Wireless 10 out of 10. It's the best wireless solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Director Engineering & New Business at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees
Provides superior coverage and is very dependable
Pros and Cons
- "The solution provides superior coverage and works as it should without any issues."
- "The solution currently lacks the integration of security services."
What is our primary use case?
We have different use cases for this solution. We deploy it for many of our customers in a variety of organizations including financial, manufacturing and retail. The use case depends on the needs of an organization. We are resellers.
What is most valuable?
The solution provides superior coverage and works as it should without any issues.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see the integration of security services that you'd find in Fortinet, for example, where you have the ability to integrate the firewall with it. I'd like to see some sort of security-specific platform that you find in many other solutions where there is a security gateway or something similar. For now, we deal with this by combining additional solutions with Ruckus.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This is a relatively more expensive product.
What other advice do I have?
Until now, our company has mainly used Ruckus but of late we're moving more to Fortinet Wi-Fi.
I rate this solution 10 out of 10.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Lead Presales at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Stable with good performance and connectivity
Pros and Cons
- "The solution has many innovative features."
- "Ruckus, as a company, offers an absolute good product."
- "The pricing needs to be more clear and licensing could be less expensive."
- "Technical support has been really bad since Ruckus was acquired by another company."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity.
What is most valuable?
The solution has many innovative features.
The stability is good.
We find the implementation process simple and straightforward.
The performance and connectivity are good.
What needs improvement?
Technical support has been really bad since Ruckus was acquired by another company.
The pricing needs to be more clear and licensing could be less expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using the solution for more than five years. It's been a while.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. There are no issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have more than ten customers on Ruckus currently.
How are customer service and support?
Since Ruckus was acquired, I have heard that support is not as good. Even as integrators, we couldn't get the support we needed. Therefore, we've started to move away from this product.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We've worked with Cisco, Aruba, and Huawei as well. We have system integrators for all these three solutions. We also have used it in our offices.
How was the initial setup?
As integrators, we have to know how to install it, and about configuration, as well as how to handle portal access and everything. We have to install it in our own organization first before putting it in the customer space. That's why we have the capabilities to implement it and it's not too hard for us.
It was a straightforward installation. Actually, other than Ruckus, all other installations are a little bit tricky. Ruckus was really good when I installed it five years back. Recently, if you go for Cisco or even Aruba and Huawei, they have some tricky configurations. With a controller, there is a different configuration. If you wanted to use it as a standalone solution, there is a different configuration as well.
Specifically, Cisco is very bad when it comes to installations. It can take three to seven days to sort out issues, to convert to emails, and to put in a support request, then they will help and everything. Though you will get good support from Cisco support, the process is not good. Aruba is definitely good. Ruckus is the easiest.
We have 4% of our team dedicated to Wi-Fi and Network. We that three engineers, that include me, plus a manager.
What about the implementation team?
As implementors, we are able to help our clients with the initial setup.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
After all of the acquisitions and mergers, the pricing has been a bit of a mess. They need to work to fix it.
There are no subscription fees for Ruckus.
What other advice do I have?
We are integrators.
We are using the latest version of the solution.
Laptops and phones, all kinds of wireless devices, are at every office these days. Having a Wi-Fi network is really important. You need it as well to connect to meetings and IoT solutions.
Due to evolving technologies in Wi-Fi, we are now getting more than one GBPS throughput. Even on the LAN, for accessing the applications, having something that can increase or guarantee connectivity is crucial.
Ruckus, as a company, offers an absolute good product. The features they came up with weren't even offered by Cisco. The performance that we were getting made it so that we have replaced Cisco in a number of use cases. However, once support dropped off, we started to shift to Huawei and back to Cisco. We also occasionally work with Aruba.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. It's the best solution on the market.
However, due to the issues surrounding support, I would not necessarily recommend Ruckus. I'd likely recommend Aruba, which is also quite good. Aruba has very good support. They have very good access points and different models with different licenses. Overall, it is really good.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Managing Director at Evenor Info Solutions Pvt Ltd
Stable, great in interior and exterior environments, and offers a strong signal
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is very simple."
- "The product is very good and very reliable and functions well in indoor and outdoor settings."
- "The pricing of the product can be a bit expensive. They should work on making pricing more competitive."
- "The product is very expensive."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution internally and also help clients set up the product for their companies.
It's a frequency. They will provide the tool and stable wireless frequencies.
How has it helped my organization?
The throughput has been excellent.
What is most valuable?
The solution does not disconnect, which is extremely helpful, especially when you are working from home.
The signal, strength-wise, is its most valuable aspect. These frequencies pass through touch one to 200 voltage. The distortion will not affect this product. That's why we suggest it to our clients.
The initial setup is very simple.
We have found the solution to be very stable. It's great in interior and exterior environments.
The scalability is great.
What needs improvement?
The pricing of the product can be a bit expensive. They should work on making pricing more competitive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution since 2015.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product. The product is very good and very reliable and functions well in indoor and outdoor settings.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of the product is quite good.
In my organization, right now, we have 35 workers and we are planning to move our office. There will be 5,200 people there.
We do plan to increase usage.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support could be better. They should also have it so that it's included and you should not have to pay extra for it.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm also familiar with Aruba. Compared to Aruba, the frequency will not disconnect.
We tried Cisco, also, however, we heard that it's not a good product. Price-wise, they're really cheap, however, they are not a better product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is extremely simple and straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult. Typically, one access point can be deployed in 15 minutes.
The solution doesn't really need much maintenance. We have used it for seven or eight years without incident.
What about the implementation team?
Our engineers are able to implement the solution for our clients. We can implement it for ourselves in-house using our team. We can easily mount the materials.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is very expensive. Technical support should also be included in the pricing.
We tend to deal with yearly licensing renewal fees. We buy packages in bundles and then, every year, we need to pay to renew.
What other advice do I have?
We are Ruckus partners. We are systems integrators.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using at this time.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Founder, Director at Tres Infosol Pvt. Ltd.
Easy to use, overall good functionality, and simple to manage
Pros and Cons
- "Ruckus Wireless is more of a plain Wi-Fi solution where it does the basic job well. Additionally, it has good conductivity, easy to use, simple to manage, and its access points can be used as standalone devices which gives flexibility in the SMB market."
- "If you want Wi-Fi that will provide wireless connectivity that is good and stable, this is the solution to pick."
- "The solution lacks a lot of features other solutions provide. If you are an organization that is more focused on security or you need a lot of other features, such as location tracking then Ruckus Wireless may not be the right choice. If you want a solution with more than basic security I would choose Arista or Aruba."
- "The solution lacks a lot of features other solutions provide."
What is our primary use case?
Ruckus Wireless is used for networking and security. They have both cloud-based and on-premise controllers available. You often see this solution in the hospitality sector.
What is most valuable?
Ruckus Wireless is more of a plain Wi-Fi solution where it does the basic job well. Additionally, it has good conductivity, easy to use, simple to manage, and its access points can be used as standalone devices which gives flexibility in the SMB market.
What needs improvement?
The solution lacks a lot of features other solutions provide. If you are an organization that is more focused on security or you need a lot of other features, such as location tracking then Ruckus Wireless may not be the right choice. If you want a solution with more than basic security I would choose Arista or Aruba.
Ruckus has gone through too many changes in their management, and in the last four or five years, they have been lacking feature sets that others provide. Additionally, the integration, network security, and BLE features need to be improved. There are key features they are still lacking.
For how long have I used the solution?
I used Ruckus Wireless within the past 12 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is scalable. However, in terms of the scalability of the controller, there is always a limit on the number of access points or clients the hardware can support. If the access points are placed in a decent place with multiple options of controllers everything works well.
Ruckus Wireless is the best fit for the SMB market which they have a dominant presence.
We have deployed the solution in an educational institute and in a restaurant that has a lodging segment and a coworking space.
How are customer service and support?
I have not faced any problems with the solution to need to contact the technical support.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is straightforward. It can be done in a short period of time.
What about the implementation team?
Once you deploy Ruckus Wireless correctly, there is no maintenance required. It is close to maintenance-free, except for some operational jobs which depend upon what the customer may want and that is where you need human intervention.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you walk into any restaurant or hotel you will find Ruckus Wireless solutions because it is economical when it comes to pricing. There is a basic subscription for the license and support.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have evaluated Arista and Aruba.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Ruckus Wireless to anyone who is looking for a plain Wi-Fi solution. If you want Wi-Fi that will provide wireless connectivity that is good and stable, this is the solution to pick. If you need a solution with a lot of features for the network, such as wireless intrusion prevention or internal location tracking, there are other solutions that you should look for.
I rate Ruckus Wireless an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
Head of IT Network Division at Panorinformatika
Flexible and reasonably priced with good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The scalability has been very good."
- "Overall, we are very satisfied with its capabilities."
- "It would be ideal if the solution offered more features."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for a variety of companies, including those in transportation and the government sector as well. It's used for wireless access.
What is most valuable?
Overall, we are very satisfied with its capabilities.
The pricing is very reasonable.
It is flexible.
It contains almost all of the new features that solutions require for wireless access.
The scalability has been very good.
Technical support has been good.
What needs improvement?
It would be ideal if the solution offered more features.
The product could use more integration capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've used the solution for a while now. We use it continuously, on different projects.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We've installed the solution for many clients so far.
We find the solution to be very scalable. I'd rate the scalability at about an eight or a nine out of ten.
We have ten employees that work directly with the product.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have been satisfied with technical support, they have been helpful and responsive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use solutions such as Juniper, Cisco Meraki, Ruckus, and Extreme. We are an independent integrator company, so we use the best solution for the customer.
How was the initial setup?
The time it takes to install the solution depends on the number of the EPs. We are speaking about the settings, not the manual installation. If we are speaking about the configuration, it takes one day in most cases.
We have a team of ten that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. They are all engineers.
What about the implementation team?
We handle the implementation process for our clients.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is reasonably priced as compared to, for example, Cisco, which is much more expensive.
Customers need to pay a yearly licensing fee.
What other advice do I have?
Every month we have different installation projects. Sometimes we use Ruckus if the customer is satisfied with this solution. Usually, we suggest things to the customer based on if the price and if a client is price-conscious they tend to choose this, as opposed to Cisco, which is more expensive.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We have been happy with it so far.
I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
Executive Director at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
A familiar brand that is reliable and I haven't experienced any problems with it
Pros and Cons
- "I am familiar with the brand and it works well."
- "The price could be improved."
- "The price is on the higher end. It's quite expensive, but that is what you get with these types of solutions."
What is our primary use case?
We have an internal network in the house that we use it for. It all has access points all over.
What is most valuable?
I am familiar with the brand and it works well.
What needs improvement?
The price could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the high-end version of Ruckus in my house and we will be using it in my building. We have an outside company to help us with this.
I have been using it in my house for two or three months.
We are using the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have not had any issues with the stability of Ruckus Wireless.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There are six of us in my house that use this solution and we also have an outside guest house that has access.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have not contacted technical support.
How was the initial setup?
I did not install this solution, we had outside help.
What about the implementation team?
We had an outside company install this solution. They oversee the network in my home.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is on the higher end. It's quite expensive, but that is what you get with these types of solutions. When you are dealing with Cisco or Ruckus, it's going to be a higher price.
What other advice do I have?
It's been good so far and I have not experienced any problems.
I would rate Ruckus Wireless a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Wireless Network Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees
A wireless solution that is scalable and reliable
Pros and Cons
- "Ruckus Wireless is a valuable solution. It's both scalable and reliable."
- "It would be better if there were more visibility on the cloud. We have some lack of visibility because of wireless interference, and you have to do some troubleshooting for the packet capture. They have a built-in packet capture, and we can monitor the application. You can see all things over the cloud. They also provide an on-premise solution, so they need to improve the on-premise version and ensure an output with more visibility. Live monitoring in a live environment should be good. What is happening with wireless is that the wireless client is not connected due to interference, and there should be a shield zone on their wireless cloud. If they give us more features on both Ruckus Cloud or on-premises, that will be best. Nowadays, security is more important for everyone using wireless technology. If they implement a little bit of reduction and prevention features for some packets on the wireless cloud, some features like web filtering and some prevention for blocking will be good for the network."
- "Ruckus support is a little bit slow compared to others."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Ruckus Wireless for different enterprise networks.
What is most valuable?
Ruckus Wireless is a valuable solution. It's both scalable and reliable.
What needs improvement?
It would be better if there were more visibility on the cloud. We have some lack of visibility because of wireless interference, and you have to do some troubleshooting for the packet capture. They have a built-in packet capture, and we can monitor the application. You can see all things over the cloud. They also provide an on-premise solution, so they need to improve the on-premise version and ensure an output with more visibility.
Live monitoring in a live environment should be good. What is happening with wireless is that the wireless client is not connected due to interference, and there should be a shield zone on their wireless cloud. If they give us more features on both Ruckus Cloud or on-premises, that will be best.
Nowadays, security is more important for everyone using wireless technology. If they implement a little bit of reduction and prevention features for some packets on the wireless cloud, some features like web filtering and some prevention for blocking will be good for the network.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a reliable solution. There is no issue, and it's reliable. But you need to improve in cloud services because nowadays, more users are coming to the cloud, not on-premises. Because of COVID, we have more users on the cloud. So, a feature for enhancing visibility will be good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support could be better. Ruckus support is a little bit slow compared to others. They take time. They need to improve support at the partner end, customer end, and distributor end.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We're a reseller, and we set up and deploy this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a yearly license for our multiple mode 200 or 300 Ruckus Wireless systems. It's a good price.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Ruckus Wireless an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ruckus Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2026
Product Categories
Wireless LANPopular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Huawei Wireless
Ubiquiti WLAN
Fortinet FortiAP
Fortinet FortiWLM
Omada Access Points
Aruba Access Points
Aruba Instant
Mist AI and Cloud
ExtremeWireless
D-Link Wireless
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ruckus Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the best high-performance Wireless LAN device?
- What is the biggest difference between Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless?
- Which wireless controller has maximum client connectivity and high throughput?
- What is the biggest difference between Aruba Wireless and Ruckus Wireless?
- What is the biggest difference between Cisco Wireless and Ruckus Wireless?
- What are the biggest differences between Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, and Cisco Wireless?
- Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?
- Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?
- How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- When evaluating Wireless LANs, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?











