Top 10 NICE CXone Alternatives

Vendor: NICE

4.1 out of 5

14 reviews
96% willing to recommend

Top NICE CXone Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to NICE CXone based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Genesys Cloud CX, Zendesk, and Atlassian Confluence. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. NICE CXone surpasses its competitors by delivering comprehensive cloud-based customer experience solutions that include AI-driven analytics, seamless omnichannel integration, and scalable workforce optimization, ensuring businesses can enhance efficiency, improve customer satisfaction, and drive performance with innovative, user-friendly tools.

NICE Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with NICE, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Genesys Cloud CX

4.4 out of 5

Genesys Cloud CX

4.4 out of 5

NICE CXone enables seamless omnichannel experiences with flexible customization and strong scripting tools, appealing to those seeking efficient reporting. In comparison, Genesys Cloud CX attracts buyers through comprehensive deployment flexibility, robust AI features, and ease of use for reliable cloud solutions.

Download Genesys Cloud CX vs. NICE CXone Report

Pricing

NICE CXone involves a higher setup cost compared to Genesys Cloud CX, which offers a more budget-friendly onboarding expense.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone involves a higher setup cost compared to Genesys Cloud CX, which offers a more budget-friendly onboarding expense.

Zendesk

4.1 out of 5

Zendesk

4.1 out of 5

NICE CXone offers a consistent omnichannel experience with powerful call routing and AI-driven features, ideal for organizations focused on communication analytics. In comparison, Zendesk's elegant ticket management and extensive integrations cater to businesses seeking customizable workflows and a robust self-service platform.

Download NICE CXone vs. Zendesk Report

Pricing

NICE CXone requires significant initial setup costs, while Zendesk offers more competitive pricing. The difference in setup costs highlights varying budget considerations for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone requires significant initial setup costs, while Zendesk offers more competitive pricing. The difference in setup costs highlights varying budget considerations for potential users.

Atlassian Confluence

4.1 out of 5

Atlassian Confluence

4.1 out of 5

NICE CXone excels in contact center operations with a robust omnichannel experience and efficient call handling. In comparison, Atlassian Confluence is ideal for content creation and collaboration, offering extensive integration capabilities and document management features, appealing to tech buyers focused on knowledge sharing.

Download Atlassian Confluence vs. NICE CXone Report

Pricing

NICE CXone involves minimal setup costs, while Atlassian Confluence offers its setup at no cost.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone involves minimal setup costs, while Atlassian Confluence offers its setup at no cost.

Amazon Connect

4.2 out of 5

Amazon Connect

4.2 out of 5

NICE CXone offers omnichannel capabilities with strong call tracking, benefiting tech buyers needing robust customization. In comparison, Amazon Connect's integration with AWS provides scalability and cost flexibility. Amazon Connect's ease of external service integration suits those prioritizing AWS ecosystem compatibility.

Download Amazon Connect vs. NICE CXone Report

Pricing

NICE CXone may have a higher setup cost than Amazon Connect, focusing on advanced features. Amazon Connect tends to offer lower initial costs while targeting scalability and integration.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone may have a higher setup cost than Amazon Connect, focusing on advanced features. Amazon Connect tends to offer lower initial costs while targeting scalability and integration.

Five9

4.3 out of 5

Five9

4.3 out of 5

NICE CXone provides advanced scripting and omnichannel features, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive analytics. In comparison, Five9 offers robust CRM integration and AI capabilities, ideal for those prioritizing advanced integrations and workflow automation with a flexible, albeit potentially costlier, pricing model.

Download Five9 vs. NICE CXone Report

Pricing

NICE CXone has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Five9 offers a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Five9 offers a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced features.

Salesforce Service Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Salesforce Service Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Salesforce Service Cloud is ideal for its comprehensive feature set and integration capabilities. In comparison, NICE CXone attracts tech buyers with robust analytics and cost-effectiveness. Salesforce suits users seeking extensive tools, while NICE CXone appeals to those needing flexible, intuitive systems.

Download NICE CXone vs. Salesforce Service Cloud Report

Pricing

Salesforce Service Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while NICE CXone may involve more complexity and higher initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Salesforce Service Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while NICE CXone may involve more complexity and higher initial costs.

Cisco Webex Contact Center

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Webex Contact Center

4.3 out of 5

NICE CXone excels in flexibility and scalability, offering comprehensive analytics and customizable workflows. In comparison, Cisco Webex Contact Center focuses on seamless integrations and robust security. A tech buyer might choose NICE CXone for adaptable pricing or Cisco for its superior integration and support network.

Download Cisco Webex Contact Center vs. NICE CXone Report

Pricing

NICE CXone offers a straightforward setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller businesses, while Cisco Webex Contact Center presents a more complex and potentially higher initial investment ideal for larger enterprises seeking extensive customization.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Unified Contact Center Express

4.5 out of 5

Cisco Unified Contact Center Express

4.5 out of 5

NICE CXone excels in omnichannel capabilities and advanced analytics, appealing to those prioritizing insights and flexibility. In comparison, Cisco Unified Contact Center Express attracts businesses needing robust integration and scalability, valuable for organizations seeking adaptability and extensive features.

Pricing

NICE CXone has a lower setup cost, providing a more affordable entry point, while Cisco Unified Contact Center Express offers a more comprehensive solution with a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone has a lower setup cost, providing a more affordable entry point, while Cisco Unified Contact Center Express offers a more comprehensive solution with a higher initial investment.

Verint Open CCaaS

1 out of 5

Verint Open CCaaS

1 out of 5

Verint Open CCaaS focuses on analytics and workforce management for operational efficiency. In comparison, NICE CXone offers omnichannel capabilities and extensive integrations, appealing to enterprises seeking versatility. Verint aims for cost-effective insights, while NICE CXone enhances customer experience with integrated features.

Pricing

Verint Open CCaaS has a higher setup cost compared to NICE CXone, while NICE CXone offers more affordable initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Verint Open CCaaS has a higher setup cost compared to NICE CXone, while NICE CXone offers more affordable initial deployment.

Nuance IVR

4.0 out of 5

Nuance IVR

4.0 out of 5

NICE CXone focuses on cost-efficiency and strong customer support, attracting those with budget concerns. In comparison, Nuance IVR offers advanced AI and personalization for enhanced interactions. NICE CXone's straightforward deployment contrasts with Nuance IVR's advanced features, providing different solutions based on business needs.

Pricing

NICE CXone setup costs are notably higher, reflecting its robust feature set, while Nuance IVR offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to businesses seeking essential functionalities.

View comparison

Pricing

NICE CXone setup costs are notably higher, reflecting its robust feature set, while Nuance IVR offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to businesses seeking essential functionalities.

Show 6 more products

Related categories

Workforce Engagement Management

IVR Systems

Knowledge Management Software