Top 10 IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

4.1 out of 5

25 reviews
88% willing to recommend

113 followers

Top IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include UiPath Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration capabilities, advanced AI-powered decision-making, and a highly intuitive user interface that enhances efficiency and streamlines complex workflows for businesses.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

UiPath Platform

4.4 out of 5

UiPath Platform

4.4 out of 5

Both @{product_a_name} and @{product_b_name} differ significantly in user preferences. @{product_a_name} attracts with competitive pricing and support. In comparison, @{product_b_name} appeals through advanced features. Tech buyers might prioritize budget with @{product_a_name} or capabilities with @{product_b_name} for informed decisions.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. UiPath Platform Report

Pricing

UiPath Platform's setup cost is regarded as moderate, providing an accessible entry point, while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) may involve a higher initial investment, influencing cost-conscious buyers.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Power Automate

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Power Automate

3.9 out of 5

IBM RPA emphasizes integration with Watson and hybrid cloud support, suiting complex tasks. In comparison, Microsoft Power Automate excels in Microsoft product integration, offering a low-code environment. Tech buyers might choose based on integrations with existing systems or desired simplicity in implementation.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. Microsoft Power Automate Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation incurs a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Automate, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation incurs a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Automate, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.

Automation Anywhere

4.2 out of 5

Automation Anywhere

4.2 out of 5

Automation Anywhere is ideal for businesses seeking flexible cloud integrations and user-friendly automation. In comparison, IBM RPA stands out with its robust AI capabilities and scalability, appealing to enterprises with complex environments needing advanced AI-driven solutions.

Download Automation Anywhere vs. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report

Pricing

Automation Anywhere reviews highlight its competitive setup costs, focusing on affordability. IBM Robotic Process Automation reviews indicate a higher initial investment, emphasizing robust enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

Blue Prism

3.9 out of 5

Blue Prism

3.9 out of 5

Blue Prism excels in reporting with SQL database access and a user-friendly control room for non-coders. In comparison, IBM RPA offers strong AI-driven insights and integration within IBM's ecosystem, featuring a drag-and-drop interface for accessible task automation.

Download Blue Prism vs. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report

Pricing

Blue Prism involves substantial initial setup costs, while IBM Robotic Process Automation offers a more accessible upfront pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Blue Prism involves substantial initial setup costs, while IBM Robotic Process Automation offers a more accessible upfront pricing structure.

ABBYY Vantage

4.0 out of 5

ABBYY Vantage

4.0 out of 5

IBM RPA emphasizes ease of use, rapid deployment, and integration, excelling in automation and orchestration. In comparison, ABBYY Vantage specializes in OCR capabilities, perfect for document processing. Tech buyers may choose IBM for broader orchestration or ABBYY for precise data extraction.

Download ABBYY Vantage vs. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) offers lower setup costs compared to ABBYY Vantage, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. ABBYY Vantage's setup costs are higher, suggesting a focus on advanced features and capabilities for enterprise-level automation.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex RPA

4.1 out of 5

Nintex RPA

4.1 out of 5

IBM RPA's advanced orchestration and AI integration make it ideal for handling complex automations efficiently. In comparison, Nintex RPA's straightforward drag-and-drop interface and scalable cross-platform capabilities attract those seeking simplicity and quick deployment for less intricate tasks.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. Nintex RPA Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) offers competitive setup costs, whereas Nintex RPA is known for a relatively higher initial investment. The key difference lies in the upfront expense associated with getting started with each platform.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Intelligent RPA

3.6 out of 5

SAP Intelligent RPA

3.6 out of 5

IBM RPA is known for its simplicity and robust integration with Watson, making it ideal for users valuing efficiency and reliability in task automation. In comparison, SAP Intelligent RPA offers flexibility and integration with SAP environments, catering to varying business demands and project sizes.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. SAP Intelligent RPA Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) incurs a substantial setup cost, while SAP Intelligent RPA offers a lower initial investment, highlighting significant cost differences between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) incurs a substantial setup cost, while SAP Intelligent RPA offers a lower initial investment, highlighting significant cost differences between the two solutions.

Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition

4.5 out of 5

Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition

4.5 out of 5

Redwood Software is chosen for its finance-specific automation and support, offering cost-effective solutions. In comparison, IBM RPA attracts tech buyers with advanced machine learning and extensive automation capabilities, warranting its higher price for broader implementation needs in diverse operational tasks.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition Report

Pricing

Redwood Software involves a higher setup cost, whereas IBM Robotic Process Automation offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The difference in setup expenses highlights distinct pricing strategies between the two automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

INTELLIBOT

3.5 out of 5

INTELLIBOT

3.5 out of 5

IBM RPA excels in complex integrations with robust features, beneficial for sophisticated task automation. In comparison, INTELLIBOT offers intuitive interfaces with minimal coding and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those seeking affordable, efficient solutions without extensive technical expertise requirements.

Download IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. INTELLIBOT Report

Pricing

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) features a significantly higher setup cost compared to INTELLIBOT. Meanwhile, INTELLIBOT presents a more cost-effective setup, offering financial flexibility for businesses looking to manage initial deployment expenses more efficiently.

View comparison

Pricing

IPsoft 1RPA

1 out of 5

IPsoft 1RPA

1 out of 5

World's First RPA Solution Powered by Conversational AI. 1RPA's cognitive user interface, its dynamic scalability, and its ability to read and understand, make it the easiest to use, most cost-effective and most intelligent RPA solution in the market.

View comparison

Related categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Agentic Automation

Process Mining