Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Make | 1.2% |
| Camunda | 15.7% |
| Temporal | 5.7% |
| Other | 77.4% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camunda | 4.1 | 15.7% | 89% | 78 interviewsAdd to research |
| Pega Platform | 4.1 | 5.4% | 91% | 86 interviewsAdd to research |
At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.
What features does Make offer?In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.
Make was previously known as Integromat.
Buan Consulting, Armadia
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions | 4.0 | I find Make's drag-and-drop interface intuitive and efficient for creating automations. However, its pricing can be burdensome, and security documentation needs improvement. While Make offers flexibility, n8n is a more cost-effective alternative gaining traction in the market. |
| Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways | 4.5 | I’ve used Make for three years to automate workflows and debug issues; its clear UI, coding flexibility, and new AI feature save me time and cut costs with strong ROI. I want auto-building, deeper LLM/Ollama integration, and possibly open source. |
| Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I use Make for automating diverse workflows like inventory and social media, significantly reducing time and boosting ROI. Its simplicity, powerful integrations, and user-friendly UI are great, despite minor authentication issues. I'd give it a 9/10, wishing for a dark mode. |
| Network Engineer at AT&T | 4.0 | I use Make to build reliable, scalable API integrations and automations across many apps, saving hundreds of hours and reducing churn by 30%. It’s more cost-effective than Zapier, but needs more connectors, flexible pricing, and better troubleshooting documentation. |
| software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I used Make to automate backend integrations for an IoT dashboard, saving significant time and money by avoiding custom code and speeding up development. However, debugging complex workflows is challenging, needing better logs and error tracing. |
| Founder | 4.5 | I use Make for marketing automation, appreciating its affordable, unlimited workflows and drag-and-drop ease, saving me 10+ hours monthly. Despite occasional browser crashes, I find it stable and suitable for simpler automations, yielding good ROI. |
| Founder at WebEase | 3.5 | I use Make for automating Google Sheets and API calls, appreciating its stable webhooks and significant time savings over Zapier. My primary concerns are its high pricing and the need for a more robust code module. |
| Founder (In Development) | 4.5 | I use Make for personal automation, finding its interface easy and it significantly improves my efficiency. I've even built a LinkedIn post automation. My main concern is the restrictive free credit limit for testing, which hinders my learning. |