Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo

Top 10 ServiceNow Security Operations Alternatives

Vendor: ServiceNow
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top ServiceNow Security Operations Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ServiceNow Security Operations based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ServiceNow Security Operations surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure, real-time threat intelligence, and automated incident response, enhancing overall security posture and efficiency for organizations.

ServiceNow Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ServiceNow, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations is known for its strong automation and incident management, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers scalability with AI-driven insights and Azure integration, appealing to organizations using Azure seeking a simplified, cost-effective solution.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel boasts a lower entry barrier with its setup cost, highlighting a noticeable difference in the initial financial commitment needed for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel boasts a lower entry barrier with its setup cost, highlighting a noticeable difference in the initial financial commitment needed for each solution.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in threat detection and real-time analysis, suitable for enterprises requiring network visibility. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations focuses on ITSM integration and automation, appealing to organizations seeking to streamline IT and security operations through a single platform.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
IBM Security QRadar often involves higher setup costs compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar often involves higher setup costs compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations integrates seamlessly with existing systems and offers excellent support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR focuses on advanced automation and flexibility, ideal for those emphasizing customization. ServiceNow is suited for integration priorities, while Cortex XSOAR appeals to automation-driven environments.
Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations involves a relatively higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR requires a moderate initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in their initial financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations involves a relatively higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR requires a moderate initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in their initial financial commitments.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations appeals to organizations needing deep IT integration, offering automated workflows and comprehensive support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides customizable security solutions with flexibility, suitable for varied environments and offering significant long-term ROI with a lower initial investment.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations offers competitive pricing and customer support, appealing to businesses with its flexible deployment and modular pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides extensive integration, making it attractive for organizations seeking comprehensive features within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward setup process, making them distinct in terms of initial investment and ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward setup process, making them distinct in terms of initial investment and ease of deployment.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam's advanced analytics and flexible pricing suit cost-conscious buyers, supporting AWS integration for cloud-focused enterprises. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations, though pricier, offers strong ITSM integration, making it suitable for comprehensive enterprise needs with excellent customer support.
Download Exabeam vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
Exabeam setup is cost-effective, offering a streamlined integration process, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations incurs higher setup costs due to its complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam setup is cost-effective, offering a streamlined integration process, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations incurs higher setup costs due to its complex configuration.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations excels in integration capabilities and provides comprehensive security incident response. In comparison, Tines focuses on automation and efficiency, offering a seamless workflow creation without code. A tech buyer may choose ServiceNow for broader operational visibility or Tines for streamlined setups.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Tines Report
ServiceNow Security Operations typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas Tines offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas Tines offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP offers advanced threat intel analysis ideal for organizations seeking automation. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations provides a comprehensive IT security management solution appealing to enterprises seeking integrated incident management and orchestration within broader IT operations.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) involves high setup costs, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This cost difference highlights varying budget considerations for organizations evaluating these security platforms.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) involves high setup costs, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This cost difference highlights varying budget considerations for organizations evaluating these security platforms.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR is favored for cost-effectiveness and real-time threat detection. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations integrates IT and business processes, offering advanced automation. Tech buyers might choose NetWitness for budget-friendly deployment, while ServiceNow attracts those needing comprehensive, integrated IT management solutions.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Security Operations offers a more budget-friendly option, making it appealing for those who prioritize cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Security Operations offers a more budget-friendly option, making it appealing for those who prioritize cost efficiency.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSOAR, praised for cost-efficient pricing and superior support, excels in automation and swift third-party tool integration. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations, justifying its higher cost, offers advanced analytics and integrated dashboards for enhanced security visibility through extensive integration capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR is noted for its affordable setup costs, while ServiceNow Security Operations requires a higher initial investment. The significant price difference highlights FortiSOAR as a cost-effective option compared to ServiceNow.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR is noted for its affordable setup costs, while ServiceNow Security Operations requires a higher initial investment. The significant price difference highlights FortiSOAR as a cost-effective option compared to ServiceNow.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations offers comprehensive integration and robust incident response features, appealing to those prioritizing seamless workflows. In comparison, Wiz Code emphasizes advanced threat detection and automation, attracting buyers seeking rapid deployment and cost-effective, cutting-edge security solutions.
ServiceNow Security Operations typically incurs low setup costs, whereas Wiz Code presents higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in their financial requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations typically incurs low setup costs, whereas Wiz Code presents higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in their financial requirements.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations excels in pricing and customer support with strong integration and automation features. In comparison, Swimlane offers advanced customization and integration with a focus on flexible security solutions, appealing to organizations seeking tailored security responsiveness despite higher initial costs.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Swimlane Report
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Swimlane requires a more involved setup process which might result in higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Swimlane requires a more involved setup process which might result in higher upfront expenses, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Google Security Operations focuses on cost-effectiveness with seamless Google Cloud integration. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations provides comprehensive features for tailored enterprise needs. Google suits cloud-centric businesses, while ServiceNow appeals to those needing detailed customization. Pricing leans favorable towards Google, with ServiceNow offering higher ROI potential.
Download Google Security Operations vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
The setup cost for Google Security Operations is significantly lower compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Google Security Operations is significantly lower compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which requires a higher initial investment.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
IBM Resilient offers flexible incident response and strong integration, ideal for managing security incidents. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations excels in service management and customization, providing extensive integration with IT services. Buyers might choose IBM for incident response or ServiceNow for comprehensive service management.
Download IBM Resilient vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
IBM Resilient has a higher setup cost compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which is noted for its cost-efficiency. The differences highlight IBM's robust features but with a more substantial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Resilient has a higher setup cost compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which is noted for its cost-efficiency. The differences highlight IBM's robust features but with a more substantial financial commitment.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Trellix Helix Connect
4.3 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations offers streamlined process automation and integration, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Trellix Helix Connect stands out with advanced threat detection and analytics, ideal for environments needing comprehensive threat intelligence.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Trellix Helix Connect Report
ServiceNow Security Operations entails a significant setup cost, while Trellix Helix Connect is comparatively cost-effective in its initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations entails a significant setup cost, while Trellix Helix Connect is comparatively cost-effective in its initial deployment.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Unified Vulnerability Management
1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations excels with robust automation and seamless integration. In comparison, Unified Vulnerability Management offers advanced vulnerability scanning and analytics. ServiceNow's strong customer support appeals to buyers, while Unified Vulnerability Management's detailed insights justify its higher cost for deeper security analysis.
ServiceNow Security Operations has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Unified Vulnerability Management, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Unified Vulnerability Management, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Proofpoint Threat Response
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations integrates smoothly with other ServiceNow services, benefiting those seeking comprehensive workflow automation. In comparison, Proofpoint Threat Response excels in providing detailed threat insights and automated response mechanisms, appealing to enterprises focused on proactive threat management.
Download Proofpoint Threat Response vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations entails lower setup costs, while Proofpoint Threat Response demands a significant initial investment. The distinction in pricing highlights the diverse value propositions of each offering in the security landscape.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations entails lower setup costs, while Proofpoint Threat Response demands a significant initial investment. The distinction in pricing highlights the diverse value propositions of each offering in the security landscape.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
D3 Security is preferred for its customizable playbooks and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations excels with extensive integration capabilities. D3 Security offers simplicity in deployment, whereas ServiceNow appeals to those requiring comprehensive, enterprise-level support despite higher costs.
Download D3 Security vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
D3 Security offers a simple setup with lower initial costs, while ServiceNow Security Operations has a more complex setup that may involve higher costs.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
D3 Security offers a simple setup with lower initial costs, while ServiceNow Security Operations has a more complex setup that may involve higher costs.
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Kroll Responder
1 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations Logo
Kroll Responder
1 out of 5
Kroll Responder aids incident response with rapid threat detection and mitigation. Users appreciate its robust analytics and customizable alert settings. Streamlining its integration process and enhancing reporting capabilities could further elevate its efficiency.
View comparison

Related categories

Security Incident Response
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management